Regional Development – Sustainability

Policy Paper Vol. 7

Visuel
Policy paper
Abstract

Close cross-border relationships and interdependencies have developed in recent decades in the SaarLorLux border region, and these are crucially linked to the European integration process. However, it is also evident that further deepening of cross-border cooperation requires new impetus and can be hindered by nationalist-populist forces. Based on quantitative and qualitative surveys of municipal decision-makers conducted in 2024 in Saarland (Germany), département Moselle (France), and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, this Policy Paper provides an overview of six key areas of action, with corresponding policy recommendations. These areas are: (1) accelerating existing efforts in education and language; (2) reducing bureaucratic hurdles; (3) strengthening municipal competencies; (4) being closer to citizens; (5) adopting pragmatic procedures; and (6) enabling cross-border cooperation in all areas. Europe, and specifically the EU, stands for cooperation that transcends borders, but this requires significant commitment and appropriate opportunities.

Policy Paper Vol. 6

Visuel
Cover Policy Paper 6
Abstract

Abstract -  With 130,000 workers commuting across the Franco-Luxembourg border daily and national policies to transform former steel wastelands into new urban neighbourhoods - Belval in Luxembourg and Micheville in Lorraine - the Franco-Luxembourg border is one of the most functionally integrated borders in the European Union. This functional specialisation of the Greater Region (GR) area - economic activities on one side, residential areas on the other - poses a significant challenge for planning policy (SDTGR, 2020: 12).

This policy paper, which is the result of a study carried out in the context of the European Capital of Culture Esch2022 (2021-2022), shows that while functional attachment to place is the basis of attachment in the cross-border area of Alzette Belval, emotional attachment is also an important democratic resource. A sign of personal projection and a symbolic relationship with the place, its identity and its values, emotional attachment indicates a willingness to stand up for the place, to enhance it and to protect it. This policy paper, based on a field study of 60 local residents, develops a typology of five dynamics of attachment to place and encourages a rethinking of relationships with the Alzette Belval area, which are often categorised as nostalgic or opportunistic. It analyses the relationships between attachment to place, citizen participation and equitable planning, i.e. planning that aims to take greater account of and involve the local population.

The policy paper concludes with some recommendations for local and cross-border policy actors:

  • Differences in cross-border development lead to a negative image of the region both inside and outside the Alzette Belval cross-border territory. They affect the sense of place and therefore represent a common challenge for the image of the cross-border territory, local commitment and coexistence.
  • For a large part of the new inhabitants, the functional attachment is the basis of their attachment. Threatened by inflation and housing shortages on the Luxembourg side and by inadequate infrastructure on the Lorraine side, it is in the common interest to strengthen it in order to (1) maintain the attractiveness of the area, (2) prevent a further increase in socio-spatial disparities and (3) provide opportunities for the development of emotional attachment.
  • The local values of hospitality, solidarity, conviviality and work culture, which have emerged from the region's industrial history and are shared on both sides of the border, strengthen social cohesion. The further promotion of these values through social institutions, cultural, club and sporting events and in public spaces helps to strengthen emotional attachment. This can increase participation and civic engagement and build bridges between new and long-standing residents.
Miniature
Summary

The Moselle Valley is one of the great river landscapes of Western Europe, with a unique natural and cultural heritage. The part of the valley that lies on the border between France, Luxembourg and Germany reflects the diversity of the Greater Region through its history and international links. For some years now, the Upper Moselle Valley has been facing the challenge of reconciling the current development dynamics with the preservation of its rural landscape.

In order to meet this challenge and to strengthen the functional cross-border connections between Luxembourg, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland, the ministries responsible for regional planning have developed the Upper Moselle Valley development concept in cooperation with regional and municipal actors on the basis of the guiding principles defined in the EOM concept.

Miniature
Summary

Lille, Strasbourg and Basel are powerful cities situated close to national borders.  Fuelled by economic, political and symbolic functions, their influence creates regions that are both metropolitan and cross-border. Thanks to interviews, cartographic work and textual analyses, this thesis looks at how cross-border metropolitan regions are constructed. This emerges as a process whereby the local actors have to mobilise together and with the European Union to negotiate with the States. This European scale recomposition generates areas subject to tensions where the cross-border conurbation is also part of other, larger regions.

Miniature
Summary

The symbolic role of national borders for cross-border regionalisation remains little-known. In order to broaden our understanding of the meaning-making capacity of borders, this paper looks at what happens when the border is apparently not the object of a symbolisation strategy. The case of Greater Geneva appears particularly informative as this cross-border cooperation seeks to develop an integrated urban agglomeration marked by the ‘erasure’ of the Franco-Swiss border. Rather than an absence of symbolisation, the border is recoded as a ‘planned obsolescence’ through its ‘invisibilization’ in the Genevan borderscape. However, the dissonance between this recoding by cross-border cooperation elites and existing popular imaginations weakens the cooperation project. To the extent that borders are powerful symbols which are intended to stimulate emotions and empathy, the ability to mobilize their meaning-making capacity is at the heart of symbolisation politics, as much for the proponents of open borders and cross-border cooperation as for the reactionary forces that emphasize national interests and ontological insecurity.

Miniature
Summary

In view of the multiple possible interpretations emerging in the public debate, the eminently cross-cutting but also sensitive nature of the topic covered, the publication endeavours first of all to explain the reasons why it would be a good idea to adopt a co-development policy. It attempts to define the objectives it should seek to achieve, the actors that might be involved as well as the possible content through a number of concrete proposals for implementation.

Miniature
Summary

In essence, the report concludes there are two different ways: the first is to give Limburg (or Dutch border provinces in general) a specific role in the application of existing multi- or bilateral instruments at the Benelux or EU level. This could include a vital role related to the EU instrument under debate (cross-border mechanism).

The second option would be the establishment of a specific national legal instrument that would provide the Province of Limburg (or all border provinces) with innovative tools to adapt Dutch legislation in the context of border obstacles.

Miniature
Summary

This article proposes a systematic analysis of the Interreg IV A projects related to cross-border territorial development which were conducted along Europe's internal borders between 2007 and 2013. It reveals the diversity of the initiatives and shows that they can be separated into different categories according to whether they aim to (1) create or improve networks between actors, (2) produce territorial observations, (3) develop strategies or, finally, (4) produce tangible for the public at cross-border level.

Miniature
Summary

Cross-border working is a phenomenon that has concerned a growing number of people in Europe since the beginning of the 2000s. Lorraine, which constitutes a large labour pool and until the recent territorial reform was the only French region with borders with three countries, is concerned by large-scale flows into Luxembourg and to a lesser extent into Germany, and therefore represents a pertinent area to study to identify the geographical and economic dimensions of cross-border working. Cross-border working is analysed as a factor in regulating the job market through its heterogeneity, but also the legal standardisation of the status of the cross-border worker.

Thematic issue Borders in Perspective Vol. 7

Visuel
Thematic issue Vol. 7
Abstract

In border areas, there is a special need for cross-border coordination between the stakeholders of spatial development and spatial planning with regard to spatially relevant challenges and future oriented development processes. The process of creating and implementing cross-border spatial development concepts requires intensive communication and cooperation across borders. However, these can make an important contribution to a coordinated cross-border spatial development and thus bundle resources as well as efficiently direct them to coordinated measures and projects. In addition to this added value of cross-border cooperation, however, there are also numerous points of friction and obstacles, which are caused, among other things, by different planning traditions and cultures, administrative systems and responsibilities, or also concern a lack of knowledge about planning instruments in the cross-border context. In cross-border spatial planning and development practice, these obstacles and the existing spatial challenges can also be countered by sub-spatial or subject-specific cooperation institutionalized and organized at different spatial levels. In this thematic issue, strategies and concepts from cross-border spatial development are presented and highlighted, which deal with different topics of spatial development, reflect a spectrum of cross-border forms of cooperation and organization and discuss the added value.

Subscribe to Regional Development – Sustainability