Sealing Borders ? Rethinking Border Studies in Hard Times

Sealing Borders ? Rethinking Border Studies in Hard Times

Border Region
Italy, Europe
Language(s)
Anglais
Introduction

Sandro Mezzadra proposes a study of borders in motion that pays attention to the violent connections between processes of global capitalism, differential inclusion, and the struggles of migrants and refugees in their often lethal attempts to cross (sea) borders.

Summary

Mezzadra redraws research paths in Border Studies since the 1990s with special focus on Europe. He points to practices of border-crossing, mobility, proliferation, change and sealing of borders and reflects on concepts like differential inclusion. With reference to examples from Italy and the life-threatening struggles of migrants who cross the Mediterranean Sea to reach Europe, he points to the current politics of violence at external borders. Furthermore, he shows how the current attempts to seal (western) borders resonate with political discourses about nationalism and the spread of authoritarian neoliberalism. At the end, Mezzadra mentions the logistical turn and proposes an approach that combines logistical studies with research on globalized capitalism and critical border studies.

Content


This working paper is based on a keynote lecture Sandor Mezzadra held on November 5th, 2018 at the international conference “B/ORDERS IN MOTION. Current Challenges and Future Perspectives” at the European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder). The paper begins with a reminder of the influential work of Helmut Dietrich who did research on the Polish-German border in the 1990s, that was influences by the “wake of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of really existing socialism” (p. 1). Mezzadra describes how after the end of the Cold War, when borders seemed just like “lines drawn on a map”(ibid.) or “frozen and congealed” (p. 2),  border relations suddenly started to change and gave rise to multiple border expressions and borders in motion that became subjects of European border studies.

However, he points to the fact that while European borders seemed to open up internally e.g. through the Maastrich Treaty in 1992, other borders like the US/Mexican border or borders in the former colonial world were still characterized by violent encounters (ibid.)

Following this introduction, Mezzadra goes on to recapitalize his own academic beginnings with border studies that was influenced by European discourses about the external frontiers, by Italy’s transition from a country of emigration to a country of immigration and by first encounters with Moroccan and Senegalese Migrants in Genoa (ibid.). Through this engagement, and theoretically inspired by the work of border scholars Étienne Balibar and Pablo Vila, Mezzadra became interested in the practices of border crossing and border reinforcement, that he perceives as a “conceptual dyad [that] is precisely the tension between the two poles, which leads us to consider the border as always in motion” (p. 3).

Referring to his common work with Brett Neilson and their most recent publications (Border as Method, or the Multiplication of Labor, 2013; The Politics of Operations. Excavating Contemporary Capitalism, 2019), he summarizes his own interest and perspective on borders that especially focusses on the connections between migrant movements and globalized capitalism and the analysis of “differential and hierarchical inclusion” produced by borders (p. 3-4).

Mezzadra states further that the proliferation and externalization of borders are currently highly debated topics in politics that must be seen in relations to rising nationalism and authoritarian neoliberalism (p. 5) that mark the “hard times” we find ourselves in (p. 6). He urges border scholars to “take sides” in these times and to intervene in the face of border violence and injustice (ibid.) In the following, he describes the border situation in the Mediterranean Sea and Italy’s effort to seal off the liquid border for migrants. He gives an example of his own engagement and activism that involved the purchase of a rescue ship to save migrants from drowning (ibid.). He finishes off the paper, with a short introduction to the logistical turn – the study of global logistics, supply chains and globalized trade across borders that creates borders that function according to Deborah Cowen like seams (p. 7).

Conclusions

In his paper, Mezzadra shows that on the one hand borders are more open and in motion than ever (proliferation/global capitalism), but that there are on the other hand strong discourses and practices (territorialisation/nationalism/migration) that foster the hardening and sealing of borders especially for migrants and refugees from the Global South. Mezzadra advocates to take sides, to intervene and to solidarize with the struggles of those who suffer under border violence. In bringing the two research strings together – migration studies and logistic studies –, Mezzadra hopes to open up new perspectives on the role of borders for globalized capitalist relations and the connected hardship of migrants. With this take on borders, he aims for a border studies research that is critical of the current political economy and nationalist discourses and that pays attention to the tensions and “multiple combinations between the seam and sealed border” in order to imagine freer and more equal futures “beyond the nation as well as beyond logistics” (p. 8).

Key Messages

Since the 1990s, border relations have changed dramatically; they are not anymore simple lines that divide territories, they are in constant motion.

Borders not only exclude but they produce complex processes of differential inclusion; creating violence, hierarchies and power dynamics between people and societies.

Currently attempts to seal borders can be seen in Europe and elsewhere (e.g. when looking at refugees crossing the Mediterranean Sea). Simultaneously, nationalist politics and authoritarian neoliberalism are strengthened while globalized capitalism produces border seams.

Critical research that pays attention to the connections of capitalism, logistics, migrant movements, and bordering processes should explicitly take sides with those who struggle under border violence in order to “grasp the potential.

Lead

Sandro Mezzadra

Contact Person(s)
Date of creation
2020
Identifier

ISSN 2569-6025