Accentuate the Regional

Accentuate the Regional

Language(s)
Anglais
Introduction

The borders between regional and urban areas have become fluid, and therefore these two spaces cannot still be considered as distinctive research fields and must be studied together. Soja’s article reflects this process and highlights eight thematic fields forming the base of critical research on urban and regional areas.

Summary

In this article, Soja covers the research fields of regional and urban studies, which increasingly tend to blend together. He makes a case for an approach consisting in considering these two research fields together, as empirical research also increasingly allows for the simultaneous observation of these categories which used to be considered separately. Soja highlights gaps and needs with regard to research; he reports eight important thematic fields for critical and comparative regional research: 1) new regionalism, 2) the regenerating power of towns and regions, 3) regional urbanisation, 4) the end of the metropolis, 5) broadened regional urbanisation, 6) multi-scalar regionalisation, 7) regional governance and planning and 8) regional democracy.

Content

Given regional and urban studies increasingly tend to blend together, Soja’s article covers eight thematic fields which offer a critical and comparative perspective on regional/urban research.

  1. The new regionalism emerged as part of the spatial turn and of the cross-disciplinary spread of critical spatial perspectives (p. 272). It was not widely covered by literature and was hardly studied empirically. In the past, regions were only considered as settings for economic activities and social processes, but nowadays, regions are seen as powerful drivers which are able to boost production, consumption and creativity on a local level and shape the globalisation of capital, work and culture (p. 273).
  2. Urbanisation and regional development undeniably develop generating forces, e.g. in the field of economic development. However, to this day we have limited information on exactly how this clustering effect works, its negative impact and its consequences on the environment for example, or on climate change (p. 274).
  3. Urban and regional concepts and shapes increasingly tend to blend, which Soja describes as a hybrid process of regional urbanisation. In metropolitan regions, regional urbanisation pushes the formerly rigid borders between urban and suburban, between urban and rural spaces and between towns and villages (ebd.). An example of this is the city-region of Los Angeles, which in the space of 60 years has become the most densely populated city-region of the United States, as evidenced by the peripheral urbanisation (40 cities of over one hundred thousand residents are located around LA) (p.275).
  4. Polycentric urban area and regional cities are the main concepts of new regionalism; they have replaced older concepts such as the metropolis (ebd.). The metropolis is going through a paradigm shift which is in keeping with a regional urbanisation model. As part of this process, peri-urbanisation and the simultaneous increasing population density in city centres are gaining importance. These evolutions can be observed throughout the world, in cities and regions such as LA, San Francisco, London, Milan, Barcelona, Berlin, Johannesburg or even in the Greater Region between Luxembourg, Germany, France and Belgium (p. 276).
  5. Cities and regions currently tend to become larger, and are referred to, among other things, as “megacity-regions” or “megalopolitan regions”. However, the most often used term is “city-region”. The term megacity refers to an urban region with over five million residents, whereas megaregions contain over twenty million residents (ebd.). A typical example of such a region is the Pearl River Delta in China, with cities such as Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Hong Kong and a total population of 120 million (p. 277).
  6. Cities are increasingly subject to globalisation, and therefore cultural and economic structures are becoming increasingly heterogeneous and the concept of global urbanisation has emerged. Urbanisation exists on several scales, exceeding sub-national regional scales and often describing economic groupings of supranational regions such as NAFTA, MERCOSUR or ASEAN. In Europe in particular, new cross-border regions have also formed (ebd.). However, according to Soja, multi-scalar regionalisation cannot be solely limited to inter-state and economic processes, we must go beyond that (cf. global regional powers, North-South relations, mixing of subnational metropoles and regions) (p. 278).
  7. With new regionalisations and urbanisations, the creation of new governance and planning structures has become indispensable. These structures should be flexible and focus on specific issues such as circulation or environment management. Examples of new forms of governance can be found in cities offering a shared management of their taxes in order to invest them in common regional and urban development projects (p. 279).
  8. In addition to the development of new urban regions, research possibilities and questions pertaining to citizenship, democracy, equity, human rights and social movements are also developing. It can therefore be observed that the right to the city formulated by Lefebvre has been broadened to form a new claim, the right to the urban region. Regionalisation based on municipalities and on participatory democracy therefore produces particularly important research topics against the backdrop of the new regionalism (p. 280).

 

Conclusions

Soja’s article highlights the fact that regionalisation and urbanisation processes are omnipresent, and that it is now impossible to draw clear separation lines between urban spaces and regions. The mix of these two spatial categories leads to numerous new research fields and needs. It is therefore required to take a fresh look on regions, and their significance with regard to economic, cultural and social processes should be discussed. Likewise, urbanisation has become an increasingly complex issue, which stretches throughout the world and generates new research fields such as those pertaining to mega-regions or peri-urbanisation. These regional and urban merging processes also raise new questions with regard to cohabitation and to the organisation of such spaces. Soja concludes that in the fields of governance and planning in particular, as well as regarding regional democratisation, new strategies and concepts are required to meet the challenges of regional urbanisation and of the new regionalism.

Key Messages

The threshold between urban and regional research fields cannot be maintained, as these two spatial categories increasingly tend to blend together, allowing for the identification of new hybrid forms. The aim is therefore to subject these new urban/regional forms to critical and differentiated research. This research can specifically focus on the density, size and scale of urban/regional conurbations as well as on their significance for economic, social, technological and cultural developments. Democratic processes and the new forms of organisation in the fields of planning and governance should also be subjected to critical analysis. Soja therefore recalls the multiple research possibilities and empirical phenomena ensuing from the dissolution of city/countryside dichotomies, namely urban/region spaces.

Lead

Prof. Edward Soja (*1940 - †2015), Geograph und Stadtforscher, kanZuletzt Prof. für Stadtplanung an der University of California, Los Angeles (USA)

 

Author of the entry
Date of creation
2019
Publié dans
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, volume 39, Issue 2
Identifier

DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12176