L’institutionnalisation de la coopération transfrontalière entre collectivités locales / Die Institutionalisierung der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit zwischen lokalen Gebietskörperschaften

L’institutionnalisation de la coopération transfrontalière entre collectivités locales / Die Institutionalisierung der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit zwischen lokalen Gebietskörperschaften

Border Region
France-Belgium, France-Luxembourg, France-Germany, France-Switzerland, France-Italy, France-Monaco, France-Andorra, France-Spain
Language(s)
Français
Allemand
Introduction

The article written by a jurist specialising in public law reinforces the organic aspect of institutionalisation of cross-border cooperation between local regional authorities and national authorities. It treats the bodies that are located in border regions and organises this cooperation.

Summary

The contribution represents the entire pallet of bodies of cross-border cooperation that have developed along the borders of the French continent that borders eight adjacent states, and potentially their regional subdivisions. There are national bodies, i.e. associations (everywhere), bodies under French law ("sociétés d’économie mixte locale" [local mixed-economic companies] and European districts) and bodies under foreign law. Subsequently, supranational bodies are present (GÖZ, EVTZ, VEZ) that owe their success to legal harmonisation. However, other bodies that resulted from the early phase of cross-border cooperation (work groups) are receding.

Content

The contribution is assigned to the area of public law and applies an indicative method. It presents the entire breadth of bodies of cross-border cooperation that have developed along the borders of continental France that borders eight adjacent states, and potentially their regional subdivisions. First, it introduces national bodies that are only of lesser interest, i.e. associations under private law that are present in all the examined legal systems, specific bodies under French law (in particular "sociétés d’économie mixte locale" [local mixed-economy companies] and European districts) and bodies under foreign law (in particular in Spain, in Wallonia, in Baden-Württemberg and in Rhineland-Palatinate). Secondly, it introduces supranational bodies. In particular, the ones that use the technique of legal harmonisation are successful in practice (cross-border local administration union (grenzüberschreitender örtliche Zweckverband; GÖZ), European Grouping of Territorial Co-operation (EGTC), association for Euro-regional cooperation (Verbund für euroregionale Zusammenarbeit; VEZ)), while others that still come from the early phase of the law on cross-border cooperation (working groups from the mountain area) are receding.

Table of contents:

  • Introduction
  • Low interest in national bodies
  • Specific bodies under French law
  • Local mixed-economic company (SEML)
  • The "cross-border local administration union" (grenzüberschreitende örtliche Zweckverband; GÖZ), called a European district
  • The bodies intended in the legal systems of France's neighbours
  • The "syndicat mixte" [administration union]
  • The regional association in Baden-Württemberg and the planning association of Rhineland-Palatinate
  • Medium interest in supranational bodies
  • The success of partially consistent bodies of cross-border cooperation
  • The cross-border local administration union (grenzüberschreitende örtliche Zweckverband; GÖZ)
  • European Grouping of Territorial Co-operation (EGTC)
  • The association for Euro-regional cooperation (Verbund für euroregionale Zusammenarbeit; VEZ)
  • The reduction of atypical bodies of cross-border cooperation
  • The crisis of existing associations in the form of regional work groups
  • The marginalisation of a "rerouted" body, the European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG)
  • Conclusion
Conclusions

An increasing development of the legal measures (on national and supranational levels) and a pervasive change to the mentalities of the actors led to progress in institutionalisation of cross-border cooperation between the regional authorities that went beyond the wildest dreams of the founders of this form of approach between the European states. Nevertheless, great obstacles continue to exist. They result mostly from the complexity of this legal peculiarity that is reinforced with further developments. A truly harmonised European legislation that reduces national differences and characteristics of each border to a minimum is yet to be developed.

Key Messages

Several types of bodies of cross-border cooperation between local regional authorities and authorities have little to no success in practical implementation: the national bodies, the bodies from the early days of cooperation, and the bodies the precise object of which is not cross-border cooperation (but, e.g., cooperation between economic companies).

The bodies whose legal systems are harmonised on a supranational level are on the rise, whether this is about agreements to create a specific border space (e.g. between France, Germany and Switzerland), general agreements on the level of the European Council or EU regulations.

 

Lead

Philippe Cossalter, Professeur de droit public, Sarrebruck

Author of the entry
Perrine
Dethier
Contact Person(s)
Date of creation
2019
Publié dans
Revue Générale du Droit
Identifier

978-3-639-56094-7