Les espaces frontaliers, des espaces à la marge ?

Les espaces frontaliers, des espaces à la marge ?

Border Region
Union européenne, Grand Est, Wallonie, Luxembourg, Allemagne.
Language(s)
Français
Introduction

This chapter of the work examines the border location of the cross-border spaces and shows the relativity of the different situations depending on the spatial analysis standards.

Summary

How far are the border areas in fringe areas? This chapter emphasises the relativity of the fringe location of the borders depending on the considered spatial and temporal standards. The ambiguous relationship between fringe and border is initially discussed by various emblematic cases in France and Europe. The standard must therefore be changed in order to look at the type of fringe location, which is then reflected by a multi-scale approach of the border regions, between the EU as a whole and the cross-border regions in North-Eastern France. These elements permit a definition of the fringe area in conclusion.

Content

Context. The book La France des marges [The fringe areas of France], which contains this chapter, was published to answer a question: The question of the "fringe areas" was a subject of the admission exam of the CAPES and the state exam in history and geography in France in 2017 and 2018 (selection procedure for secondary school teachers in France). The scientific editors of the book, Martine Candelier-Cabon and Solène Gaudin, have dedicated a chapter to the national borders for the many types of fringe areas within the space. They entrusted Grégory Hamez and Frédérique Morel-Doridat to write these. The target of this chapter is to therefore point out elements of easily understandable and conveyable knowledge for the target group of students aiming to become teachers.

Methodics. The authors of this chapter chose two different approaches for their work:

  • A theoretical and bibliographical one that lists the most important scientific works that have already been published on the subject. This permitted discussion of the question of fringe areas along the borders in general, pointing out the many situations, also in a non-European context, and emphasising the importance of relativisation depending on the spatial analysis standards.
  • An approach of statistical and cartographical examinations on the level of the entire European Union (on the level of NUTS2) and the level of cross-border spaces between France, Belgium, Luxembourg and Germany (adjusted level LAU1/2). The authors discuss the formation of peripherals based on existing literature, including the development rate of the population within two decades (1991-2011) and migration in a more recent period (2009-2014) - with these two variables permitting the development of a long-term trend for one generation and a short-term trend concerning the attractiveness/repulsion.
Conclusions
  • The main results point out the different perception of the fringe regions according to the spatial analysis standard and differentiation of cases of marginalisation at the border. These may include camps with (legal or non-legal) refugees and depopulated spaces as well.
  • Concerning the depopulated spaces, there appears to be no factor for formation of peripherals in the border region on the level of the European Union as a whole. The Eastern European countries are facing particular issues. So do certain regions in other countries, though they are generally structural issues caused by the economy (industrial change) or on a national level (deterioration of the situation throughout the country).
  • The same logic applies at a local level for cross-border spaces in North-Eastern France. The question of industrial change or reduction of agriculture appear to be important factors for repulsion from a certain place (negative migration), differing by country of origin: All large and medium-sized French cities show pre-urbanisation, coinciding with a reduction of the population in the city centres and growth of the spaces in an area of 40 km; vice versa, the city centres in Germany are growing to the detriment of the peripherals, while all spaces are increasing in population in Luxembourg and a smaller part of Wallonia.

 

 

Key Messages
  • The areas in the fringe region are usually close to the border, particularly regarding the presence of refugees or migrants.
  • Socioeconomically, the border regions are not fringe regions when viewed on a European level, as far as the formation of peripheries is concerned.

 

Lead

Laboratoire LOTERR EA 7304, Centre de recherche en géographie, Université de Lorraine

Author of the entry
Contact Person(s)

Grégory Hamez

Fonction
Professeur
Organisation
LOTERR, Université de Lorraine, France
Date of creation
2019
Publisher
Presses Universitaires de Renne
Identifier

9782753555372